Greyworld + Camille Utterback + Furtherfield + Marie Sester

Greyworld

• Creates work in urband, public spaces
• Work focuses on play
• Subtle projects, most of their work in the beginning was sound based
• Environmentally reflective projects
• Founded by Andrew Shoben, an English academic, broadcaster, and artist.
• Considered one of the world's leading practitioners of public art
• Given many lectures and broadcasts on art in public

"Railings" (1996)

• Railings tuned to play a song

"The Source" (2004)

• Moves up and down when according to the stock market going up and down

"Trace" (2005

• Sound oriented
• As you walk through, conversations, laugher, and other things can be heard

"Clockwork Forest"

• Key in tree
• Plays music

"Public Toilet"

• Public sculpture of a person squatting, pooing in public
• Strong message for World Toilet Day

"Trafalgar Sun" (2012)

• Bringing brightness and liveliness to England in a time of darkness

Camille Utterback

I can't understand what he's saying.

1. Camille is a Interactive Installation Artist and ___.
2. How does Camille engage participants to engage with her art?
1. She uses digital technologies as a medium for interaction.
3. What is Camille does to sense a users entire body to create a visceral connection between the real and the virtual?
1. She uses Video Tracking software to do this. 
4.  Why does Camille write her own software and design her own interfaces?
5. By creating ____ she hopes to engage people emotionally and viscerally.
6. Most people know Camille because of her most famous artwork known as ____.
7. What is the significance between the cave drawings and her artworks

Furtherfield

• Founded by Ruth Catlow and Marc Garett
• Believes Art and Technology play an essential role in how we see our culture and society
• Diversity and collectivity
• Involved in Net art, Media art, Art activism, "Hacktivism" 
• Ecological approaches to work a tte intersection of art

Feral Trade Cafe

• Art exhibition + working cafe selling food and drinks shared over social media.
• Provides opportunities for critical debate, exchange and participation in emerging ecological media art practices.

DIWO

• Do it With Others
• Mail Art projcet - corresponds with others across physical and digital mail networks
• Second DIWO project initiated by Furtherfield

A Crowded Apocalypse

• Crowd sourcing to create and simulate conspiracy theories
• Symbol > Them(entities) > Evidence > Plots > Streets
• Writing and protesting against conspiratory narratives

Marie Sester

"Tell Me the Truth" (2009-2010)

"Access" (2003)

"Beam" Narrative (2009)

David Rozin

Born in Jerusalem, Israel
Currently lives in New York, New York

How he became interested in Interactive Art
- Background in industrial design
- Came to ITP in NYU as a student
- After being introduced to physical computing and programming he felt a "huge surge of creativity"

Works of Art (categories):
- Mechanical Mirrors
They behave similarly. You put something in front of it and the mirror will reflect the object. "The piece has no content without the viewer".

"Weave Mirror" (2007)
"Trash Mirror"
"Angles Mirror" (2013

Software Mirrors
- Less physical oriented and more software oriented
- Camera + computer

"Shaking Time Mirror" (2005)
- Examining the notions of time, scanning, motion, and stagnation

"Mirror Number 5" (2001)

"Easel" (1998)
- Brushes reveals camera pixels
- Different "paints" choose different cameras

Blog Entry Class 2

It is difficult to compare happenings and cybernetics to each other because, in theory, they seem quite different. Happenings mostly involve performance art pieces that involve the audience and is conceptualized largely around the idea of the interaction between  the artwork and the spectator. Cybernetics on the other hand is more about the idea of testing what a machine can do and the limits and capabilities it can perform. The two areas deal with opposite subjects, humans and machines, and differ in many ways because of that. I think one of the core differences of the happenings and cybernetics is, in part, the idea of spontaneity. With happenings, while key elements are planned, because there is so much focus on audience interaction, an unpredictable move from the audience can change the artwork completely and such a thing cannot be predicted. However, with Cybernetics, artists work within the constraints of a man-made device that has every detail about it planned out.

I think they do share similarities though. One of the main similarities I have found between happenings and cybernetics is that they both orient around human interaction, whether with machines or with other people. Neither present art as one fixed object or piece but rather invite people to manipulate the art and experiment with it.l-50t=-6nh-ghj3``````

The level of interaction with humans differs slightly, however. Happenings invite audience members in to become a part of the art and from there, each spectator can more or less change the art from the inside. In cybernetics, the humans are encouraged to change the art and challenge the boundaries of the technology they are presented with.

Happenings, to me, are extremely interesting because they are similar to theatre in the sense that no two performances will ever be the same, even if the same key elements are used. Different reactions and interactions from the spectator change the work and make it unique every time. Based on environment, the amount of spectators, etc. you can have two of the same “shows” that are drastically different.

Cybernetics was interesting because of different machines that were shown to us and that could perform many interesting functions on their own.